The elite corporate socialists are, and always have been the most racist off all people. Nathaniel Wyel gave some very interesting insight into the American Socialist Party in 1903 after they were criticised by the Second International for their ‘indifference to the widespread lynching of Negroes by white mobs.’ Wyel continued in saying:

​

"The Socialist National Quorum replied that only the abolition of capitalism and the victory of socialism could prevent the procreation and production of “lynchable human degenerates.” This extraordinary response seems to have satisfied the international socialist organisation."[8]

​

One of the most suppressed books in Europe today which is as good as banned in Germany, and largely unavailable elsewhere is a book written by the father of the Paneuropa project (which launched todays EU), Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, a high level freemason and Venetian descended aristocrat. If there was a book that should be required reading for all EU citizens it is his work called Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism) published in 1925. I believe it accurately portrays the twisted eugenics and racial superiority the elites believe in, and definitely tells an incredible version of what forced immigration could really be all about at the top secret level aside from the deliberate raising of tension and divide and conquer tactics. Kalergi wrote that;

​

“The man of the future will be a mongrel. Today’s races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of space, time, and prejudice…The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.”[9]

​

Does this not sound like the masterplan of a eugenics movement? This is knowledge that we the global commoners are not supposed to know, and emotional blackmail, and shaming tactics used by the media and government on the public for speaking out would very quickly hold zero weight when analysed with this information and the truth behind war. Would we all stay quiet about enforced multiculturalism if we were informed of the elite’s abhorrent agenda of undermining sovereign nation’s customs and cultures so the world can be standardised? I don’t think so. Again, for the doubting Thomas, look at the live birth rates of the indigenous peoples living in Western nations in comparison to the birth rates of African, Asian and Middle Eastern immigrants. Logic alone tells us that eventually the white races will eventually become a minority in their own countries. Look at the UK for the perfect example of how the demographic of their country has changed over the last fifty years. There is nothing racist or hate inspired in pointing that out, yet the average youth is too brainwashed by political correctness to even think critically on the subject, all thanks to liberal professors and polluted education.

​

It is hard to blame the youth when they are being so hopelessly let down by Government, academia and the mainstream media who are selling their souls on a daily basis. A great example of one such individual is the former Political Editor for the BBC Andrew Marr. In his show on BBC he interviews key newsmakers and shapes public opinion for millions of viewers and listeners every year. I suspect he has known about, and been on-board with the Coudenhove Kalergi plan for almost two decades. I say this because of an article he wrote for the UK Guardian newspaper in February 1999, where he spoke about individual’s resistant to enforced mass immigration and multiculturalism. He wrote;

​

"What then can be done [with those who resist immigration and multiculturalism]? (Apart, of course, from widespread and vigorous miscegenation [interbreeding], which is the best answer, but perhaps tricky to arrange as public policy.)"

"I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain 'natural' beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off."[10]

​​

Again we always need to look behind the scenes to see the agenda of those pushing political agendas that the majority don’t want, and are so quick to vilify individuals for speaking out over. The BBC is a den of paedophiles at the top which is intertwined with the paedophile rings that are at the heart of the British Government, which have been exposed so often and so openly over the last five years especially, and yet the BBC calls such factual claims a "conspiracy theory", i.e. lacking in substantive proof. The BBC is totally in line with the EU’s agenda of multiculturalism and is causing a lot of immigration in the first place through their subversive ‘political charity’ called BBC Media Action which is engaged in undermining sovereign nations wherever it is based.

​

The European Union gives out an award every second year called the Coudenhove-Kalergi European prize given to European leaders who further his sick agenda, mass immigration being a major component (Herman Van Rumpoy and Angela Merkel are two who have received the prize). In a nut shell it is aimed at the destruction of the white race. That needs to be said. I have heard many top researchers state that the number one obstacle in the way of World Government is and has been the white western nations. The mass immigration and integration of cultures combined with a hyper level of tolerance laws oppressing freedom of speech and expression flows on from that as a means to re-engineer society to the Fabian socialists yearning to have society "much closer to the heart’s desire." 

Professor Frank Ellis, a former lecturer with the University of Leeds wrote in 2009 that:

​

“No successful society shows a spontaneous tendency towards multiculturalism or multiracialism. Successful and enduring societies show a high degree of homogeneity. Those who support multiculturalism either do not know this or, what is more likely, realize that if they are to transform Western societies into strictly regulated, racial-feminist bureaucracies they must first undermine those societies.”

​​

Professor Ellis continued in saying that; “the multiculturalists hope to control and dominate every aspect of our lives…Today's "political correctness" is the direct descendent of Communist terror and brainwashing…In the post-Stalin period, political correctness even meant that dissent was seen as a symptom of mental illness, for which the only treatment was incarceration. Today's dogmas have led to rigid requirements of language, thought, and behaviour, and violators are treated as if they were mentally unbalanced, just as Soviet dissidents were.”

​

Ellis argued that Under Stalin “totalitarianism was much more than state terror, censorship, and concentration camps; it was a state of mind in which the very idea of a private opinion or point of view had been destroyed…And once enough people are made to think this way, it is functionally totalitarian even if a single dictator does not personally control everything.”[11]

​

There is a price to pay for society not thinking for themselves and speaking their minds and expressing their true thoughts and opinions. And that price is going to be totalitarianism for everyone because people don’t understand the real agenda. When you remove one societal group’s right from having their freedom of religious expression, or freedom of conscience, you have stopped yourself further down the track, and I hope you all understand this very important point. Professor Ellis found this to his cost when he was forced to resign from Leeds University on supposed racism charges for trying to bring his important message to the world. The University of Leeds issued a media release stating that it was investigating an alleged breach of its "diversity policy". It also said Ellis's views were wholly at odds with the University's values, and that he had jeopardised the university's obligations under the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000. There was no hate in the message the man was trying to bring to the world. It was merely repeated statements of politically incorrect facts warning about totalitarian controls sneaking in through government policy which ultimately forced him to take early retirement before he was sacked.

​

In April 2016 the Limerick Post reported the story of a man of Middle Eastern origin who has been living in Ireland for nearly a decade, who had been working in a Limerick refugee centre. They claimed that "staff have been subjected to physical attacks and mental abuse by individuals and gangs of radical Muslim men living in the centre", many of whom he claims "have cheated the direct provision system" for asylum seekers. He testified from his own experience that senior staff working in the center were afraid of these radicals, and that "people needed to be made aware" of what he describes as “a worsening situation”. The unnamed Middle Eastern man claimed that "in some of them I have found a worrying level of extremism, bordering on hatred, which could potentially manifest in some sort of devastating way, as their numbers will continue to rise”.

​​

Allowing a direct flow of immigrants to enter into any country almost unchecked from a war torn radicalised region like Syria, means inevitably we are opening the door to terrorists coming into the country. ‘Ivan’, as the Middle Eastern man was identified as said that “the goings on in direct provisional centres are quite different from what mass media and the non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are reporting.” Ivan gave the warning that “radical minded economic migrants, who are mostly students and workers, have filled up a large number of vacancies within the direct provisional system”. He had to quit his job because the mental and at times physical abuse from radical Islamists in the refugee center got so bad. He claimed that he has repeatedly "seen people cheat the reception and interrogation agencies with their false stories". The most important part of his testimony that needs to be focused on was when he warned that many of these people were not even from war torn regions. He stated that;

​

"If any action is taken against these radical culprits, NGOs and anti-racist groups back them up with protection they don’t deserve. They give the same statement that these people have fled a traumatic situation in their own countries and that we should treat them with respect, give them protection and provide them with more rights than some full Irish citizens don’t even have”.[12]

​

For telling the true story above, which included details of Ivan being physically attacked, the Limerick Post came in for a scathing backlash from Doras Luimní, who they accurately classified as ‘a non-elected, self-appointed local human rights group.’ Doras Luimní claimed the Limerick Post had no right to publish the story and notified the Limerick Post that "it was facing the likelihood of a criminal prosecution for incitement to hatred and would also be complained to the Press Council of Ireland for publishing racist and defamatory comments". This is in spite of the fact that CCTV footage and witness testimony proved the story was true, which led to a criminal trial. Despite this, Leonie Kerins, the director of Doras Luimní has tried to have the editor and journalist, including the staff of the Limerick Post fired, and associates have unleashed a hateful online campaign to try and get the Limerick Post to "abide by their version of the immigration narrative". The online targeting even stooped so low as to engage in "the deliberate targeting of the reporter whose photograph and those of family members were circulated on social media along with the Doras Luimní demands". The Limerick Post correctly called out Doras Luimní on their immoral behaviour as "trying to silence the dissenting voice of a vulnerable immigrant worker and stifle the right to free editorial expression", to which Doras Luimní repeated their narrative along with the threat that they had reported allegations to authorities.[13]

​​

There are those who don’t want certain opinions voiced in public, and criticising the rationale behind immigration is one such topic many influential and well-funded foundations and NGOs don’t tolerate.

When I saw the denial of the obvious and the vicious and ruthless tactics of those trying to shut down free speech my suspicions kicked into overdrive. After researching the financiers and backers of Doras Luimní, I found some familiar and consistent connections to globalist control mechanisms. To start with there is The Atlantic Philathropies, founded by Irish American business tycoon Chuck Feeney. His father Leo was a member of the Catholic Freemasonic Order known as the Knights of Columbus[14], which like all other masonic Orders is Luciferian at the top. Chuck Feeney’s financial empire, just like the man’s personal life appears throughout history to be shrouded with obsessive secrecy. He founded Duty Free shopping with American Robert Warren Miller, whose children all married into royalty, not something Royals generally allow unless they knew there was blue blood flowing in the other half also. Feeney privately funded a Washington office for Sinn Fein in 1995 to the tune of $720,000, while his Atlantic Philanthropies foundation funded Ireland’s Centre for Public Inquiry in 2004 with $4 million, whose director was Frank Connolly, the brother of IRA man Niall Connolly who was one of the Colombia Three.[15] One of the directors of the Atlantic Philanthropies, Elizabeth J. Mc Cormack, was an advisor to the Rockefeller Family & Associates.[16] Where have you heard that name before?

Next on the list of Doras Luimní financiers is The Sisters of Mercy. The next group backing Doras Luimní is the Community Foundation for Ireland, patroned by current Irish President Michael D. Higgins.

The Directors as of April 2016 include;

Louis Fitzgerald; founder of Airtricity.

Barry Connolly; former managing director of the Sunday Tribune and a number of commercial radio stations, and current director of Richmond Marketing.

Mike Gaffney; partner with KPMG.

Richard George; former partner with KPMG, holds multiple directorship with Irish and foreign businesses and a member of the Governing authority of Maynooth University.

Eamonn Heffernan; Director of Irish Life, past president of the Society of Actuaries and former Chairman of the Pensions Board and of the Irish Association of Pension Funds.

Dr Brian Keogh; past President/Treasurer of the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland.

Anna Lee; former CEO of South Dublin County Council.

Máire O’ Connor; former Partner of McCann Fitzgerald and a Director of The Irish Stock Exchange.

John Rockett; former Head of Private Banking at AIB.

Roddy Rowan; co-founder of Dimension, a marketing  communications group.

Brian Geoghegan; former Director of Leaseplan Ireland MKC Communications. He was a member of the National Economic & Social Council and sits on the Advisory Council of the Policy Institute of Trinity College.

The list of Directors for the Community Foundation for Ireland is the elite across the business, government and academic world who have huge control over the minds, well-being, careers, and retirement funds for the youth and elderly of this country. This group deserves very close scrutiny indeed. 

The last financier of Doras Luimní was a Catholic religious order called the Redemptorists. When I looked them up I was immediately struck by what I was looking at on their website.