Despite the ENMOD convention in 1976 banning the weaponising of the environment it is ongoing worldwide with at least 18 known Ionospheric heaters around the globe, but there are probably many more. The US Air Force publication called Operational Defenses through Weather Control in 2030 states that "within 15 years…DEW [Directed Energy Weapons] will become increasingly common on the battlefield" and that they will have "disorienting effects on the operator of their target" and that they will also "affect the internal circuitry of the target or internal tissues of the operators." [48] The poor individual at the receiving end of such treatment is being cooked and will not have a clue to what is happening to him. Under the definition of weapons or weapons system the United States Space Preservation Act of 2001 defined such weapons as;

​

"The use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations."[49]

​​

The final point I will make on HAARP like ionospheric heaters is that despite military documents talking about such technologies as being likely in 2025 or 2030 it is without question a reality right now today. In a May 14 2014 United States Appropriations Subcommittee Defense hearing senator Murkowski asked military officials about the status of the HAARP facility and was told by Dr. David Walker who is Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Science, Technology, and Engineering, that;

​​

"We are moving onto other ways of managing the ionosphere, which the HAARP was really designed to do, was to inject energy into the ionosphere and be able to actually control it...but that work has been completed".[50]

​

So in reality, what I have shown you documentation of so far, despite being in the realm of science fiction for the vast majority of people, it is already replaced or in the process of being replaced by something more sophisticated. Nexrad - Next Generation Radar (This is your homework if you wish to dig into another level of geoengineering). The last word I will say about these so called research programs and research facilities is that if these people were writing about the dropping of the nuclear bomb on Nagasaki or Hiroshima they would probably call it research, and I’m sure would never call it what it was, an attack. 

​​

This subject according to many whistle blowers is still highly classified, which makes it tremendously difficult if not impossible to find the full facts concerning what exactly is taking place where and who is doing it, but that being said I have unearthed some incredible information. In 2013 a joint paper was published by the Carnegie Institute for Science and the Georgia Institute of Technology called "Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering coalitions to exclude broad participation". They envisioned "strategic multilateral implementation (of planetary scale geoengineering) through an exclusive ‘club’ that increases benefits to members at the expense of those excluded." [51]

​

The paper states in the abstract that;

​

"coalition members have incentives to exclude non-members that would prevent implementation of solar geoengineering at a level that is optimal for the existing coalition." [52]

​

The authors envision that ‘starting in 2015… negotiations among club members only will determine the setting of the global thermostat for the next ten years. In each subsequent decade, negotiations begin anew, and determine a new thermostat setting for the next ten years.”[53] I believe such assertions to be disingenuous at best due to the overwhelming evidence that such practices have been ongoing for more than a decade. I don’t rely on these publications to point out any pertinent climate facts either as they rely on the same climate models as the IPCC, so they do not have credibility as far as I’m concerned, other than to point out that these geoengineering coalitions exist and they can control the weather. I wonder if the Environmental Research Letters publication were speaking about the same coalition mentioned in the World Economic Forum Global Risk 2013 report.

​

One such coalition was talked about in the UK Guardian newspaper reporting in 2010 that a "powerful coalition wants to engineer the world’s climate". The article states that "it is not out of the question that in three decades the climate of the Earth could be determined by a handful of Communist Party officials in Beijing." [54] I agree that the climate of the earth will be under communist like control, but that control will be exerted by the United Nations, not China, and I suspect that is already the case although most likely hidden behind a network of corporate and military control. The article goes on to state that Edward Teller and Lowell Wood of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory near California "have been promoting aerosol spraying into the stratosphere as a simple and cheap counter to global warming" since 1998, even though they had both "long been associated with conservative think tanks that deny the existence of human-induced global warming." The Guardian journalist Clive Hamilton found this strange as he is obviously a believer in the global warming myth, and accuses so called "right wing think tanks" of being "active in climate denialism". Even the term climate denialism is absurd on its own merits. To deny climate is to deny that there is such a thing as weather and seasons. It is man-made global warming or even the so called evidence of warming that is being challenged. He told the reader what I believe is a much more accurate reason behind what is taking place when speaking of Teller and Wood saying "they believe it is humankind's duty to exert supremacy over nature." One of the "right wing" think tanks Hamilton highlighted was the American Enterprise Institute which the article states is "part funded by Exxon Mobil." Since 2010 they have "launched a high-profile project to promote geoengineering", despite not believing in global warming. I must point out that this type of reporting is often used as a false argument behind those trying to push the propaganda that the majority of reports disproving global warming are funded by major oil interests. [55] The opposite is the case. A scarcity lie, carbon taxes and the global warming fraud = higher prices. Think about it.

​

Forbes reported in January 2014, that "the undeniable truth is global warming alarmists raise and spend far more money – including far more untraceable special interest 'dark money' – than global warming skeptics". [56] The article goes on to expose the fact that so many of the so called "right wing groups" opposing the warming argument don’t display it on their website publications, and surprise, surprise, they all support a carbon tax. Forbes Journalist James Taylor points out that being generous environmental skeptic funding is at most in the region of around $46 million per year shared among 91 conservative think tanks opposing the global warming theory. On the other side if you take the top five environmental groups (Greenpeace, The Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund, National Wildlife Federation, and the Sierra Club) supporting the global warming myth, they alone raise more than $1.6 billion per year. Even Shell Oil company has been reported to be a "longtime supporter of carbon dioxide restrictions and has a history of funding global warming activist groups." [57] This strategy is called the Hegelian Dialectic which is the control of both sides of an argument or situation to bring about the secret hidden agenda or synthesis which had been pre-planned in advance. They are controlling the narrative on all fronts. They all know and are supporting the fact that "the debate over climate engineering is at present confined to a tight-knit group of scientists, some of whom want to keep the public in the dark and fend off regulation of their activities."[58]

​​

Two individuals that kept coming up time and again in my research were Professor Ken Caldeira of Stanford University and especially Professor David Keith of the University of Calgary and Harvard University. Professor Keith and Caldeira were named as being covertly funded by none other than Bill Gates to the tune of $4.5 million as of 2010 and "Keith will not reveal what the money is being spent on", downplaying it as "a little private funding agency", if you can believe that! [59] Gates along with his former chief technology officer at Microsoft, Nathan Myhrvold are invested in and controlling another weather manipulation company called Intellectual Ventures which plans to "pump sulphur dioxide into the upper atmosphere through a 30-kilometre hose held aloft by V-shaped blimps", which consequently generates water vapour. Even Richard Branson is trying to get into weather modification through geoengineering.[60] In 2008 a team of geoengineers financed by Bill Gates filed over 8 patents, one of which describes;

​

"a method of managing risk includes selling individual insurance policies regarding areas to be protected by storm suppression equipment. The method discussed also includes finding at least one of purchase, operation, or maintenance of the storm suppression equipment at least partially through premiums collected from the selling."[61]

​

Now we are starting to see the real danger of geoengineering, in that if you refuse to pay the cabal who can turn of the rain, or completely flood you out depending on their choice, you are enslaved. Bill Gates name was even on the patent highlighted above. The Bill and Melinda Gates foundation were reported in 2010 to have spent $23 million buying 500,000 shares in GM food giant Monsanto which has rightly been named on many occasions by many observers as the "most evil corporation on the planet". [62] What is absolutely incredible to me is that Bill Gates is openly enabling the aerosol spraying of aluminium and multiple other metals into the earth’s atmosphere through geoengineering while investing in a company that has patented genetically modified seeds resistant to increased levels of metals in the soil. [63] You couldn’t make it up. But it gets even more incredible. In 2007 American German freelance journalist, historian and economic researcher William Engdahl wrote an article for the Global research centre on globalization stating that Bill Gates along with the Rockefeller foundation, the Norwegian Government, Monsanto corporation and many others have invested tens of millions on what is known as the "doomsday seed vault" built inside a mountain in remote northern Norway in a place called Svalbard inside the arctic circle. The article claims the facility ‘will contain up to three million different varieties of seeds from the entire world, "so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future".

​​

William Engdahl asks the correct question;

​

"Did we miss something here? Their press release stated, so that crop diversity can be conserved for the future. What future do the seed bank’s sponsors foresee, that would threaten the global availability of current seeds, almost all of which are already well protected in designated seed banks around the world?"[64]

​​

Wayne Hall, a teacher, freelance translator, and former member of the European Nuclear Disarmament movement testified before the European Parliament on April 9 2013 that;

​

"elements such as barium, aluminium, strontium, and manganese are showing up in lab tests of precipitation in lethal quantities across the globe’, and that ‘the soil PH has been so radically changed in the forests of the USA’s Pacific Northwest, that tests have indicated a 1,500 percent increase in alkalinity." [65]

​​

Monsanto were reported in Forbes in 2013 of acquiring Climate Corp for $930 million, a company "which underwrites weather insurance for farmers". Climate Corp was founded by what the article called "early google employees" and Google Ventures were named as one of its biggest investors.[66] The article quotes Climate Corps ability to ingest "weather measurements from 2.5 million locations and forecasts from major climate models, and processes this data along with 150 billion soil observations to generate 10 trillion weather simulation data points, requiring it to manage 50 terabytes of live data at any given time. Needless to say, this company has built daunting barriers to entry." [67] Monsanto certainly doesn’t like regulations or being sued for that matter and actually managed to get a bill passed through congress in 2013 called the Monsanto Protection Act which was signed into law by Barrack Obama in 2013.[68] The Act gave them protection from immunity from any harm to humans and or the environment from the planting of GM crops and the spraying of their pesticides, putting the company above the power of the Supreme Court. That tells you all you need to know about the power of this corporation which is owned by a conglomerate of banking institutions including J.P Morgan Chase and Company which I highlighted earlier as being behind the disinformation campaign surrounding geoengineering through the International Bankers front organisation called The Council of Foreign Relations.[69] 

​

So why have you not read more about this in your newspapers or heard this information on your weather forecasts? One answer lies in the corporate control network that owns 95% of the world’s media through five major corporations. The world’s leading provider of "interactive weather graphics and data services" called Weather Central LP sold a 70% stake of its business to the infamous banking dynasty Rothschild family in 2011. This company’s weather information is broadcast by "more than 400 broadcast television clients in 21 countries worldwide" and is watched by "hundreds of millions of viewers". [70] One has to ask the question why the major financial institutions are so invested in weather products and delivering weather forecasts. I would argue that when you are up to your neck in climate geoengineering programs it is very useful to own the distribution network of information allowing you to control the forecast models through the media which they will surely use to cover their tracks, and have already been doing for years.

​​

Did you know that you can bet on the weather using financial instruments called derivatives?

Knowing the short, medium and long term trends in weather patterns/systems in advance would enable investors to make an absolute fortune betting on agricultural commodities or even by investing in weather derivatives. This is already happening in the Chicago Mercantile Exchange which describes itself as "the world's leading and most diverse derivatives marketplace’" An investor can bet on hurricanes, the weather getting hotter or colder, or the amount of snow, ice or rainfall in any region in the world.[71] How could one resist if they had the accurate knowledge of geoengineering programs in advance? Derivatives are completely fraudulent financial products to add to the scam. They exist outside the current monetary system and are conjured up out of thin air with a market worth more than 2 Quadrillion dollars of funny money gaming the system for all its worth.

​​

The number one concern of people all around the world studying the effects of the aerosol spraying is mass contamination of lands and water with aluminium, barium, cesium, strontium and a host of other substances which are detrimental to human health. It is in effect a mass experiment, and we the citizens are the lab rats being toyed with by covert military and corporate programs. Dr Russell Blaylock wrote about nano-aluminium in a publication for the National Health Federation (US) stating that;

​​​

"My major concern is that there is evidence that they are spraying tons of nanosized aluminum compounds. It has been demonstrated in the scientific and medical literature that nanosized particles are infinitely more reactive and induce intense inflammation in a number of tissues. Of special concern is the effect of these nanoparticles on the brain and spinal cord, as a growing list of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s dementia, Parkinson’s disease and Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS) are strongly related to exposure to environmental aluminum."

​

"Nanoparticles of aluminum are not only infinitely more inflammatory, they also easily penetrate the brain by a number of routes, including the blood and olfactory nerves (the smell nerves in the nose). Studies have shown that these particles pass along the olfactory neural tracts, which connect directly to the area of the brain that is not only most effected by Alzheimer’s disease, but also the earliest affected in the course of the disease. It also has the highest level of brain aluminum in Alzheimer’s cases."

​

"The intranasal route of exposure makes spraying of massive amounts of nanoaluminum into the skies especially hazardous, as it will be inhaled by people of all ages, including babies and small children for many hours. We know that older people have the greatest reaction to this airborne aluminum. Because of the nanosizing of the aluminum particles being used, home filtering system will not remove the aluminum, thus prolonging exposure, even indoors."

​

Steps need to be taken now to prevent an impending health disaster of enormous proportions if this project is not stopped immediately. Otherwise we will see an explosive increase in neurodegenerative diseases occurring in adults and the elderly in unprecedented rates as well as neurodevelopmental disorders in our children. We are already seeing a dramatic increase in these neurological disorders and it is occurring in younger people than ever before. [72]

​​

In February 2014 the Cyprus Times wrote an article on the unusual and unexplained noticeable increase in people complaining of "eye and skin problems, as well as a mushrooming numbers of asthma sufferers and those coping with memory deterioration." This along with pressure from groups investigating geoengineering forced the government to conduct tests taking samples from the air in the skies over Cyprus. The tests came back as supposedly being normal, but Green Party members were not satisfied with the testing carried out stating that they "had no input or control over what was tested and when or how it was tested". [73] Very relevant concerns were raised such as the specialised equipment that is required to test for nanoparticles and the forestry department that carried out the tests reply to the Green Party’s concerns were said to be "very vague’" The agreement between the forestry department and the campaigners was that when they saw "chemtrails" they were to report it to them so they could conduct tests, but they were met with excuse after excuse, and in truth they "don’t know how or when they eventually did it", nor do they know what substances the department tested for. The people of Cyprus know something is wrong as they used to have perfect clear blue skies, and as Green Party councillor Linda Leblanc said “there is a drought now and there are no obvious chemtrails but if you look at the sky it isn’t a clear blue, it’s hazy. A milky cloudy substance has been introduced to the high atmosphere.”[74]

There is historical precedent for this secret spraying in many western countries. The UK Guardian reported in 2002 that millions of people living in Britain were in germ war tests sprayed in secret trials effectively turning "large parts of the country into a giant laboratory to conduct a series of secret germ warfare tests on the public". Trust us, we wouldn’t do you wrong is the attitude from the government, denying people a public enquiry after a cluster of birth defects happening in localised regions over specific periods of time. One experiment involving anthrax left a Scottish island uninhabitable for more than a decade. Can you imagine a government spraying anthrax on its own citizens? It’s beyond criminal. Asked in 2002 if "such tests are still being carried out", Sue Ellison the spokeswoman for the Ministry of Defence said: "It is not our policy to discuss ongoing research." [75] In September 2009 Professor David Keith of Harvard and Calgary University attended the Royal Society in England as a speaker at a conference event called "Geoengineering the climate - Science, governance and uncertainty”. He stated in what can only be described as psychopathic double speak that geoengineering is "not really a moral hazard, it's more like freeriding on our grandkids".[76]  These are extremely dangerous people who I wouldn’t trust with my pet cat. In January 2018, an excellent Irish researcher on the subject put up a great video on youtube and his website climatechangeagenda.com documenting David Keith making a more shocking statement which long time researchers have been saying for a long time. Keith said that because of decisions made to implement geoengineering programs tens of thousands of people can die every year as a result.[77] I think this figure is very likely to be very low and wide of the mark in time due to the increasing toxicity of people’s bodies due to ingesting metal nano-particles which accumulate in the brain.

​​

There have been reports of weather manipulation on television on rare occasions and even some incredible accusations made. One such claim was made in 2010 when former Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez was reported on Russia Today News  as saying that a "US weapon test caused the Haiti earthquake". [78] I remember reading a report written on World Reports Limited (now removed from the internet) by the late Christopher Story, an “on occasion” advisor to Margaret Thatcher that stated the exact same as Hugo Chavez. Story elaborated further that the attack was used to launder massive amounts of political dirty money through Haiti’s Central Bank while the country lay in ruin. The Red Cross support relief was a farce as money raised to build 3000 new homes resulted in only 60 homes being built and the money gone. Another permanent US military base has came out of it. Think about it! Another accusation of weather manipulation was made by Iran’s former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who accused "Western countries of plotting to "cause drought" in Iran by using high tech equipment to drain the clouds of raindrops." [79] Most would think Ahmadinejad is crazy, but it wouldn’t surprise me in the slightest to learn he was absolutely correct. My question to the US government is this. With the power to generate precipitation, snow fall, steer weather systems etc., why is the bread basket of the United States, California suffering from a massive unprecedented drought? If I had the technology I would be ensuring the State and the nation’s food supply as a top priority. If the Chinese can stop rain from falling on the Olympics opening ceremony in Beijing and the government of the United Arab Emirates can make it rain to order in their country, why is the American government not intervening? They could do it in Vietnam but not in California?

​​

The power to create drought, floods, massively intensify storms, or de-intensify storm systems and even steer a storm in the direction you wish it go is the reality of the world we live in today. This has been a reality for decades. Armed with this knowledge one has to ask why there is an increase in so called natural disasters happening around the world with devastating consequences for the populations they affect. Why was the recent devastation in the record breaking Philippines typhoon not de-intensified or steered out of the way of the major population centres? A long time researcher and documenter of geoengineering activities nicknamed Dutchsinse (Michael Janitch) documented in a video that went viral on Youtube that directed energy microwave weaponry had been used on typhoon Yolanda in 2013.[80] The video prompted a media response from U.S. scientist Dr. Mahar Lagmay who is the executive director of the U.S. NOAH weather research program. The news anchor on Phillipines ANC News asked;

​​

"Is this true? Is there a possibility that a microwave pulse from any ultra-magnetic machine or satellite can trigger anything like that to disturb the weather?"

​​

Dr Lagmay claimed that 'before he [Dutchsinse] could relate the microwave to the cyclone or the typhoon that hit the Philippines, he must first demonstrate that the microwave was the one who formed it.” From the images he was showing it would appear that the typhoon was already developed when he was showing the microwave bulges that were being transmitted."

​​

Note that he didn’t deny that microwave technology was evidently used on the storm system! Dutchsinse failed to account for the massive sea and land based water vapour generation geoengineering method which fuelled the strength of the storm system. This is what led to his somewhat successful rebuttal. But we do know microwave technology was used on the typhoon repeatedly, and what transpired was one of the most powerful storm systems in recorded history leaving over 6000 people dead and over 1300 missing. I recommend you look at the evidence for yourself. [81] I would like to remind you again of the quote from former US Secretary of Defense William Cohen who stated that;

​

"Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves."[82]

​​

Former US Science Advisory Committee member under the President Johnson administration and former associate director of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University of California Professor Gordon J. F. MacDonald wrote in 1968 that;

​​

"Among future means of obtaining national objectives by force, one possibility hinges on man’s ability to control and manipulate the environment of his planet. When achieved, this power over his environment will provide man with a new force capable of doing great and indiscriminate damage.

As I will argue, these weapons are peculiarly suited for covert or secret wars". [83]

​​

One man who seemed uniquely well informed well ahead of time was former Fortune Magazine senior editor Alvin Toffler wrote in 1980 saying that;

​​

"Ultimately we may see the convergence of weather modification, computers, satellite monitoring, and genetics to revolutionize the world’s food supply". [84]